Социологическият анализ на икономическите неравенства: проблеми на методологията

Александър Стоянов

Authors

Chief Assist. Prof. Dr Aleksandar Stoyanov Department of Economic Sociology, Faculty of General Economics, UNWE Author

Keywords:

Economic differentiation, Economic inequality, Heterogeneity of incomes, Status distances, Social class, Social relations, Subject relations

A14, B16, B23, C01, D31, D63, O15, Z13

Abstract

The paper outlines basic elements of the sociological analysis of economic inequalities. The baseline argument of the paper is that economic inequalities are a sociological concept which carries different content in comparison with economic differentiation and heterogeneity of incomes, which in turn are most often perceived as direct proxies of economic inequalities. The theoretical analysis of the concepts of economic differentiation and economic inequality made is focused on their specific interpretation schemes and measurement strategies and methods. The main problematic areas of classic measures of economic differentiation and are outlined including an analysis of most common research findings. The focus on the sociological analysis of economic inequalities (interpreted as status distances between economic roles and resources associated with these roles) includes the principle aspects of this analysis and a comprehensive research program (including concepts and indicators). Some methodological conclusions regarding the interpretations of economic inequalities are made, based on three ISSP surveys (1992, 1999, and 2009). Also based on empirical data some of elements of the outlined research program with regards to Bulgaria are explored: economic differentiation (Gini and extraction ratio), status identification its relationship to subjective social class, etc.

References

Anthony B and Atkinson and first (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 244 - 263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6

DG Champernowne, FA Cowell (1998). Economic inequality and income distribution. Cambridge University Press. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lk5cccSd-v4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR21&dq=Economic+Inequality+and+Income+Distribution+Champernowne&ots=fLPAgHWKIh&sig=15G21vp49pCCGeVU1o4s8p64XZw

J Faik (2012). Socio-Economic Influences on Income Inequality-Projections for Germany. URL: http://vwl.faik.net/downloads/FaMa-Diskussionspapier_4-2012.pdf

M Franzini, M Pianta (2011). Explaining inequality in today? s capitalism. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/urb/wpaper/11_08.html

B Milanovic, M Gradstein, Y Ying - Available at SSRN 253368, 2001 (2001). Democracy and income inequality: an empirical analysis. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=253368

Keith and Hope and first (1982). A Liberal Theory of Prestige. American Journal of Sociology, 87(5), 1011 - 1031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227553

V Boshnakov, V Mintchev, A Naydenov (2011). Sources of Income Inequality: Empirical Evidence from Bulgaria. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/226127

EN Wolff, A Zacharias (2007). Class structure and economic inequality. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/31700

EO Wright (2000). Class counts student edition. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DyOqt4fYCaAC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Class+Counts.+Student+Edition+Wright&ots=huWcEMcnz5&sig=3nhiAh7tkElumVH2NLrClRfQiIg

Erik Olin and Wright and first and University of Wisconsin-Madison (2002). The Shadow of Exploitation in Weber's Class Analysis. American Sociological Review, 832 - 853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240206700603

EO Wright - Approaches to class analysis, 2005 (2005). Foundations of a neo-Marxist class analysis. Approaches to Class Analysis (Ed. list(last = "Wright", first = "E. O.")). URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WPOYUpW2lGgC&oi=fnd&pg=PA4&dq=Foundations+of+Neo-Marxist+Class+Analysis+Wright&ots=K4QelUte6-&sig=q0U_WiyHrCOPlsEsce7gY9ha2hw