The Positive and Negative Obligations of the State for the Protection of Wildlife and Forest
DOI:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2021.2.06Keywords:
Wildlife, Forest, Protection, Obligations, Implement, Legal mechanismsAbstract
The study aims to analyze the legal system for wildlife conservation and make recommendations for the implementation of negative and positive obligations of the state. The study analyzes the methods, results and discussions of legislation related to wildlife and forest violations and other illegal activities. It includes a review of international law, CITES, implementation and regional initiatives, as well as domestic wildlife and forest violations and associate illegal activities. The aim of the present study is to avoid in the future the already identified weaknesses in the implementation of the positive and negative obligations of the states for the protection of wildlife and forests and to increase their effectiveness.References
B Boer, R Ramsay (1998). International environmental law in the Asia Pacific. London: Kluwer Law International. URL: https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=5392586&publisher=FZR504
CPD BIOLÓGICA-CBD - Nações Unidas, 1992 (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. Treaty Series. URL: http://www.rbma.org.br/anuariomataatlantica/pdf/folder.pdf
P Marinov - Proceedings, 13th International Scientific …, 2020 (2020). Sustainable development and spatial location of protected green spaces in Bulgaria. Substainability of Forest-Based Industries in the Global Economy (Ed. NA). URL: https://repozitorij.sumfak.unizg.hr/en/other_documents/sumfak:3770/show-file/0#page=28
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Radoslav Mishkov (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
