Relevant and Quasi-Relevant Management Accounting Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2023.2.04Keywords:
Management accounting, Behavioral accounting research (BAR), Qualitative characteristics of useful accounting information, Cognitive biases, UncertaintyAbstract
This paper examines two criteria for relevance of management accounting information: the decision and the decision process. The study aims to show whether the information that is relevant to both the decision and the process of decision making (process-relevant) can lead to predictably different decisions compared to the information that is relevant to the decision but irrelevant to the decision process (process-quasi-relevant). Based on Drury (2018, p. 285) a field experiment was designed to test the hypothesis employing 352 students and PhD students. The results generally support the view that process relevance seems to be a superior to decision relevance as a qualitative characteristic of useful management accounting information. Fully rational agents would derive the same meaning, and thus the same utility, from both process-relevant information and process-quasi relevant information. Boundedly rational agents, however, as confirmed by the field experiment, derive different utility from the process-relevant information and the process-quasi-relevant information. If management accounting aims to partner managers in decision making, the focus of generating and communicating the information should be on the core driver of the better decisions, and this intuition suggests that the decision process should be a pivot for the management accounting information.References
WJ Bruns - The Accounting Review, 1968 (1968). Accounting information and decision-making: some behavioral hypotheses. The Accounting Review, 43(3), 469-480. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/244070
WF Chua - Accounting review, 1986 (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 601-632. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/247360
F Collins, P Munter, DW Finn - Accounting Review, 1987 (1987). The budgeting games people play. The Accounting Review, 62(1), 29-49. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/248044
HJ Davidson, RM Trueblood - Accounting Review, 1961 (1961). ACCOUNTING FOR DECISION-MAKING.. The Accounting Review, 36(4), 577-582. URL: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=00014826&asa=N&AN=7097578&h=Hv09llCFAjM5%2F23uWeRhfz9R8m60C%2BNJayHytXbvAwV5Mv2GGPYHZ%2Fr%2FO%2FN4WPxI3A5oUQlGFKCEL%2FKsfnEXww%3D%3D&crl=c
JS Demski - The Accounting Review, 1973 (1973). The general impossibility of normative accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 48(4), 718-723. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/245294
GA Feltham - The accounting review, 1968 (1968). The value of information. The Accounting Review, 43(4), 684-696. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/243630
JS Hammond, RL Keeney, H Raiffa - Harvard business review, 1998 (1998). The hidden traps in decision making. Harvard Business Review. URL: http://www.fannyhavas.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/TheHiddenTrapsinDecisionMakingHBR1998.pdf (accessed 2023-05-01)
D Kahneman, D Lovallo… - Harvard business …, 2011 (2011). Before you make that big decision. Harvard Business Review, 51-60. URL: https://economy4humanity.org/commons/library/biases.pdf
P Kircher - The Accounting Review, 1961 (1961). Theory and Research in Management Accounting. The Accounting Review, 36(1), 43-49. URL: https://search.proquest.com/openview/ce7d097204644a4418895adb11515a9d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1816369
AC Littleton - The Accounting Review, 1938 (1938). The relation of function to principles. The Accounting Review, 13(3), 233-241. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/238926
D Lovallo, O Sibony - McKinsey Quarterly, 2010 (2010). The case for behavioral strategy. McKinsey Quarterly, 1-14. URL: https://www.veruspartners.net/wp-content/uploads/old_articles/cabe10.pdf
M Moonitz, CL Nelson - The Accounting Review, 1960 (1960). Recent developments in accounting theory. The Accounting Review, 35(2), 206-217. URL: https://search.proquest.com/openview/1c82d3ab72a4e7fe7b1154ee34d78200/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1816369
GJ Murphy - The Accounting Review, 1976 (1976). A numerical representation of some accounting conventions. The Accounting Review, 51(2), 277-286. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/244838
DL Raun - The Accounting Review, 1961 (1961). Accounting for decisions. The Accounting Review, 36(3), 460-471. URL: https://search.proquest.com/openview/b1e003b64a0b7d3b94b625f61f5154ce/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1816369
A Riahi-Belkaoui (2001). Behavioral management accounting. Westport: Quorum Books. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=263OEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Behavioral+Management+Accounting+Riahi-Belkaoui&ots=Sxzx6G9Wrn&sig=YkccyY5BwYML0XBP1USHWFAXXoQ
Keith and Shwayder and first (1968). Relevance. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(1), 86-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2490125
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Musov (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
