The Relationship Between Organizational Trust and Organizational Silence: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2024.1.02Keywords:
Organizational trust, Trust in colleagues, Trust in supervisor, Trust in management, Organizational silenceAbstract
This study examines the relationship between trust in colleagues, supervisors, and management, and the dimensions of organizational silence, such as defensive and deafening silence, across different sectors and regions. By analyzing data from previous studies in education, industry, and services in countries like Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey, and Afghanistan, the study provides insights into how trust affects organizational silence. Using secondary data analysis, statistical methods were employed to explore these relationships. The findings show significant disparities based on sector and geographic location. For example, a strong inverse relationship was found between trust in colleagues and defensive silence in Indonesia's education sector, while no significant impact was observed in South Korea's service sector. Trust in supervisors also had a notable effect on organizational silence, with variations depending on the sector. The study highlights the role of cultural and managerial differences and offers recommendations to enhance trust and reduce organizational silence.References
Yangin Demet and Elma Cevat (2017). The Relationship among Interactional Justice, Manager Trust and Teachers' Organizational Silence Behavior. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 325-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050304
Dong Xue Tong and Chung Yang Woon (2020). The Mediating Effect of Perceived Stress and Moderating Effect of Trust for the Relationship Between Employee Silence and Behavioral Outcomes. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1715-1737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120942914
Basit Gülden and Duygulu Sergül (2018). Nurses’ organizational trust and intention to continue working at hospitals in Turkey. Collegian, 25(2), 163-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.05.003
فتحی موسی إسماعیل عمار (2018). محددات الصمت التنظیمى وأثرها على الاحتراق الوظیفى لأعضاء الهیئة المعاونة بجامعة مدینة السادات " دراسة تطبیقیة ". مجلة الدراسات التجاریة المعاصرة, 4, 1-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/csj.2018.90439
E. Karabay Melisa and Sener Irge and A. Tezergil Seher (2018). Ethical Climate as a Mediator between Employees’ Organizational Silence Behaviors and their Trust in Leader: An Empirical Research on Insurance Sector Employees. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7, 70-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60444
KARS Mehmet and INANDI Yusuf (2018). Relationship between School Principals’ Leadership Behaviors and Teachers’ Organizational Trust. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18(74), 145-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.8
Hwang Yeoun Kyoung and Lee Chang Seek (2015). Structural Relationship between Authentic Leadership, Organizational Communication, Organizational Effectiveness, and Psychological Capital of Office Workers. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 22(4), 131-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8is7/69993
Pirie Willam Joseph (2016). Key determinants of organisational silence for non-standard workers. Management Decision, 54(6), 1522-1538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2015-0490
Saglam Aycan Cicek (2016). The Effects of Vocational High School Teachers’ Perceived Trust on Organizational Silence. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(5), 225-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i5.1474
Yu Ming-Chuan and Mai Qiang and Tsai Sang-Bing and Dai Yi (2018). An Empirical Study on the Organizational Trust, Employee-Organization Relationship and Innovative Behavior from the Integrated Perspective of Social Exchange and Organizational Sustainability. Sustainability, 10(3), 850-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030864
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. L. Slimane Tichtich, A. Khaiat, Kh. Bouchareb Bouloudani (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.