Enhancing Disaster Resilience in Cultural Tourism: A Comparative Analysis of Relief and Recovery Policies for Arts, Heritage, and Intangible Culture in the United States and Italy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2024.2.01

Keywords:

Resilience, Disaster policy, Cultural tourism, Cultural heritage, Intangible heritage
Z11, Z32

Abstract

Disaster management policy in the US and Italy has historically focused on the relief and recovery of tangible cultural assets vital to cultural tourism, including cultural heritage sites and museums. However, the COVID-19 pandemic revealed how disaster policies can protect intangible cultural assets, including the performing arts and creative workers. This study conducts a comparative analysis of cultural disaster relief and recovery policies in the USA and Italy, specifically focusing on the 2017 earthquake in Central Italy, the 2021/2022 tornado and flooding events in Kentucky, USA, and the global COVID-19 pandemic. The research aims to identify the complexities and opportunities in governmental disaster policy related to intangible culture and how this particular area of cultural tourism can be integrated into broader disaster management frameworks toward greater resiliency.  Through a review of governmental policy documents and primary as well as open-source data, the analysis reveals that pre-determined national governmental units dedicated to emergency response and recovery are critical for effective disaster management in cultural heritage, yet often lack the specialized knowledge and, to some extent, the resources, to fulfill long-term recovery, particularly with intangible cultural assets. Insights gained from this study contribute to developing recommendations for enhancing more inclusive disaster policy language that recognizes intangible cultural heritage and its role in sustainable cultural tourism in disaster risk reduction (DRR) strategies.

References

CDP Think Tank (2024). Cultura%20e%20Covid 19. DOI: https://www.cdp.it/resources/cms/documents/Cultura%20e%20Covid-19.pdf

Eric Dixon and Rebecca Shelton (2024). Housing Damage from the 2022 Kentucky Flood – Ohio River Valley Institute. DOI: https://ohiorivervalleyinstitute.org/housing-damage-2022-ky-flood/

V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, A Pirani… - Climate change 2021 …, 2023 (2023). Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing Team (Ed. list(last = "Lee", first = "H.")), pp. 1-34. URL: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/19094/

Jigyasu Rohit (2016). Reducing Disaster Risks to Urban Cultural Heritage: Global Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Heritage Management, 1(1), 59-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2455929616649476

National Assembly of State Arts Agencies (2024). Creative Economy State Profiles - NASAA. DOI: https://nasaa-arts.org/nasaa_research/creative-economy-state-profiles/

US Department of Commerce, NOAA, National Weather Service (2023). The Violent Tornado Outbreak of December 10-11, 2021. DOI: https://www.weather.gov/pah/December-10th-11th-2021-Tornado

Richards Greg (2018). Cultural tourism: A review of recent research and trends. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 36, 12-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.03.005

Downloads

Published

2024-12-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hamilton, L., & Splendiani, S. (2024). Enhancing Disaster Resilience in Cultural Tourism: A Comparative Analysis of Relief and Recovery Policies for Arts, Heritage, and Intangible Culture in the United States and Italy. UNWE Yearbook, 2, 7-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37075/YB.2024.2.01