The Keynesian and Neo-Keynesian Theories of Economic Crises: Some Theoretical Aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37075/RP.2024.4.13Keywords:
Economic crises, J. M. Keynes, Fundamental uncertainty, Neo-keynesianism, Neoclassical synthesisAbstract
The Keynesian tradition dates back to J. M. Keynes and, according to it, economic crises are endogenous phenomena. The article reviews some aspects of this tradition in light of the understanding of fluctuations from market equilibrium. The object is the currents in the Keynesian theory, and the subject – their views on economic crises. The purpose of the article is to highlight certain contradictions between the ideas of J. M. Keynes and the subsequent Keynesian schools, due to the original ideas of Keynes, which subsequently fell out of the Keynesian tradition, but are essential for understanding the genealogy of crises. Scientific methods such as historical-logical analysis, comparative analysis and synthesis were used.References
RM Solow - Festschrift for Joe Stiglitz, 2003 (2003). Dumb and dumber in macroeconomics. Festschrift for Joe Stiglitz (Ed. NA). URL: https://fgeerolf.com/econ221/biblio/Solow2003.pdf
Downloads
Published
2024-12-19
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Petar Piperkov (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright to their works.
All publications are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
How to Cite
Piperkov, P. (2024). The Keynesian and Neo-Keynesian Theories of Economic Crises: Some Theoretical Aspects. Research Papers, 4, 179-190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37075/RP.2024.4.13