Students’ Social Capital, Social Space, and Civic Life in Sofia
Ключови думи :
Студенти, България, Социален капитал, Гражданска ангажираност, Градско пространствоАбстракт
After the 1989 change of economic and political regimes in Bulgaria, sustained citizen involvement in civic life has declined over the past decades, save for occasional street protests. This is especially noticeable for students of the Millennial and subsequent generation. While Sofia university students participate in street protests, overall youth apathy is reflected in un-sustained involvement in civic life. Sofia students and recent university graduates appear to live in largely unconnected social ‘silos’, composed of close friends and family on the one hand, and other friends, students or work colleagues, on the other hand. These silos are anchored in specific urban neighbourhoods and in students’ hometowns. In terms of social capital, students’ social circles comprise stable bonding capital with a high degree of trust, and less stable bridging capital with limited trust, including temporary alliances with other social groups. Social interaction among students has been observed for periods between two and seven years. Informants maintain stable bonding capital beyond their university years, while their bridging capital is occasionally re-composed for specific purposes. This points towards the existence of a flexible, adaptable social capital category, which I call “Flex Capital”. Sustained student involvement in civic life appears to be hindered by their unstable bridging capital; a lack of leadership within social groups, and by the narrowly-scoped spatial setting of social interaction.Литература (библиография)
Ådnanes Marian (2007). Social transitions and anomie among post-communist Bulgarian youth. YOUNG, 49-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308807072684
FH Allport (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=61fmAAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Social+Psychology+Allport&ots=yEJGDSs-kK&sig=WDJpF70RSkqgmSQWfMCJ9716rYQ
U Beck, E Beck-Gernsheim (1994). Riskante freiheiten: individualisierung in modernen gesellschaften. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. URL: https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/271773693
Brian D. and Dan and Loader and Mercea and first and additional and University of York and UK and University of York and UK (2011). NETWORKING DEMOCRACY?. Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 757-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2011.592648
MM Howard (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. New York NY: Cambridge University Press. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uthoQgP9tsUC&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&dq=The+Weakness+of+Civil+Society+in+Post-Communist+Europe+Morj%C3%A9-Howard&ots=1wcoapw11a&sig=XgmAwU0TD4aAWd1C1dUgMtNEGoY
PE Mitev, S Kovacheva (2014). Young People in European Bulgaria. Sofia: {{Friedrich Ebert Foundation Press}}. URL: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/sofia/12569.pdf
RD Putnam (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rd2ibodep7UC&oi=fnd&pg=PA13&dq=Bowling+Alone+The+Collapse+and+Revival+of+American+Community+Putnam&ots=G7KalWrmU5&sig=JjOxm5mO46ceHOZbd_qbvBIo-rs
H Schwartz, J Jacobs (1979). Qualitative sociology. New York NY: Free Press. URL: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tY-DqjxVOuwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=Qualitative+Sociology+Schwartz&ots=vbPMyiyO16&sig=A-vLBHI1gAiXG1fJLvy4pDznuog
Файлове за сваляне
Публикуван
Брой
Раздел (Секция)
Лиценз
Авторски права (c) 2021 Лусиен Петерс (Автор)

Публикация с Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Авторите запазват авторските права върху своите произведения.
Всички публикации се разпространяват при условията на лиценза Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).